International News

WASHINGTON, (MILLAT+APP/AFP) – A secret CIA assessment
has found that Russia sought to tip last month’s US presidential election in Donald Trump’s favor, The Washington Post reported Friday, a conclusion that drew an extraordinary rebuke from the president-elect’s camp.
“These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of
mass destruction,” Trump’s transition team said, launching a broadside against the spy agency.
“The election ended a long time ago in one of the biggest Electoral
College victories in history. It’s now time to move on and ‘Make America Great Again.'”
The Washington Post report comes after President Barack Obama ordered
a review of all cyberattacks that took place during the 2016 election cycle, amid growing calls from Congress for more information on the extent of Russian interference in the campaign.
The newspaper cited officials briefed on the matter as saying that
individuals with connections to Moscow provided anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks with emails hacked from the Democratic National Committee, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s campaign chief and others.
Those emails were steadily leaked out via WikiLeaks in the months
before the election, damaging Clinton’s White House run.
The Russians’ aim was to help Donald Trump win and not just undermine
the US electoral process, the paper reported.
“It is the assessment of the intelligence community that Russia’s
goal here was to favor one candidate over the other, to help Trump get elected,” the newspaper quoted a senior US official briefed on an intelligence presentation last week to key senators as saying. “That’s the consensus view.”
CIA agents told the lawmakers it was “quite clear” that electing
Trump was Russia’s goal, according to officials who spoke to the Post, citing growing evidence from multiple sources.
– Question marks –
==================
However, some questions remain unanswered and the CIA’s assessment
fell short of a formal US assessment produced by all 17 intelligence agencies, the newspaper said.
For example, intelligence agents don’t have proof that Russian
officials directed the identified individuals to supply WikiLeaks with the hacked Democratic emails.
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has denied links with Russia’s
government.
Those individuals were “one step” removed from the Russian
government, which is consistent with past practices by Moscow to use “middlemen” in sensitive intelligence operations to preserve plausible deniability, the report said.
“I’ll be the first one to come out and point at Russia if there’s
clear evidence, but there is no clear evidence – even now,” said California
Republican congressman Devin Nunes, the chair of the House Intelligence
Committee and a member of the Trump transition team.
“There’s a lot of innuendo, lots of circumstantial evidence, that’s